Friday, October 31, 2008

Sweatshops



I must admit that before doing a little bit of research about sweatshops, I did not know there are several in the U.S. Being narrow-minded that I am, I thought that China is among one of the countries with sweatshops. Many people are against sweatshops in general, but there are others that is for it. To me, it depends on the circumstances; such as the working condition, or the wages. This image on the left depicts a graph showing what the workers get paid in different countries and the number of days worked/earn.

A sweatshop is a shop or factory in which employees work long hours at low wages under poor conditions. This definition is more or less correct. I believe that sweatshops in most areas have changed from working in poor condition to a much better working environment. For instance,
The Department of Labor defines a work place as a sweatshop if it violates two or more of the most basic labor laws including child labor, minimum wage, overtime and fire safety laws. For many, the word sweatshop conjures up images of dirty, cramped, turn of the century New York tenements where immigrant women worked as seamstresses. High-rise tenement sweatshops still do exist, but, today, even large, brightly-lit factories can be the sites of rampant labor abuses.

Sweatshop workers report horrible working conditions including sub-minimum wages, no benefits, non-payment of wages, forced overtime, sexual harassment, verbal abuse, corporal punishment, and illegal firings. Children can often be found working in sweatshops instead of going to school. Sweatshop operators are notorious for avoiding giving maternity leave by firing pregnant women and forcing women workers to take birth control or to abort their pregnancies. For these different reasons I am against sweatshops, period. However; I think that situations can be fixed, and I believe there are shops out there that takes good care of its employees.

Sweatshops are a good idea because it gives people jobs. It is also a job that does not require much education, it can be taught in a day. Therefore, people who do no have the money for education or time, can consider working in the sweatshop industry.

The notorious sweatshops of the age of Big Business (the late 19th and early 20th centuries) virtually disappeared after World War II because of increased government regulation of monopolies and the rise of trade unions. Sweatshops began to reappear again, however, during the 1980's and 1990's because of economic globalization. Today1s economy is described as global because advancements in technology have made it possible for large corporations that were once confined to a specific geographic location to become large "multi-nationals."


If you're wondering if there are any sweatshops in the United States, the answer is yes. According to the Department of Labor, over 50% of U.S. garment factories are sweatshops. Many sweatshops are run in this country's apparel centers: California, New York, Dallas, Miami and Atlanta.

The majority of the workshops are located in different areas. There are probably sweatshops in every country in the world - anywhere where there is a pool of desperate, exploitable workers. Logically, the poorer a country is the more exploitable its people are. Labor violations are, therefore, especially widespread in third world countries. Nike has been criticized for unethical labor practices in its Chinese, Vietnamese and Indonesian shoe factories, and Haitian garment factories. Non-profit groups have documented the labor violations of retailers like Philips-Van Heusen and the Gap in factories throughout Latin America.

In conclusion, there are many different points to consider when deciding if sweatshops are good or bad. In an ideal situation, there would be a balance between production overseas and production in the United States. Companies would pay employees the current minimum wage and meet the standardized regulations relating to the work environment. Some American companies have already taken the first step in improving work conditions across the globe. With the help of the public, we can make sweatshops a thing of the past.


Sources:

http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/sweatshopsfaq.html

http://www.neoperspectives.com/sweatshopsandwelfare.htm

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/specials/madeinmisery/148660_day2home18.html

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Fashion: Art or Usability?











The Milan Fashion Week showcased a mixture of old and new styles. However, there were some that I didn't particularly find appealing or pleasing to the eyes.










The New York Fashion Week is very different from London's show. According to a reporter, Liam Obrien, "London Fashion Week is always more about promise than polish. The clothes aren’t expected to be beautifully tailored or consistent in concept like those shown in New York, Paris and Milan."







I enjoyed the New York Fashion a little more because the whole show felt more new and futuristic. The shoes were crazy high and gorgeous. The Milan's Fashion Week comes in second. Milan's entire show was not as lavish and decorative as I hoped it would be. The pieces were nice, but not eye-popping. Lastly, Paris fashion week is my third favorite. I thought that the collections were very safe. I did not see anything so incredible that I had to have it. Overall, all three fashion week shows was amazing, and it makes me want to be one of those designers!




The below images are of the dresses I did not like, and ones I liked. The ones I dislike is because I didn't think that it was very flattering. It looks rather "manly" to me. The colors are not great either because the tan makes the model look more pale. The next dress is sort of scary looking with the braid-like pattern. The ones I do like is because I simply love the color and the way it looks on the body. The white empire dress with the black belt-like around the waist is adorable. I love the simplicty and the length of it. The other dress with the bow is very pretty, and I think it's just the right proportion to the body. The color scheme goes well together.





According to one of the criticism article, there were three prominent designers, Mr. Simons, Ms. Prada andMarc Jacobs. "Ms. Prada’s most dynamic evening look is a printed organdy tunic with sheer trousers. Mr. Simons uses layers of organdy, tulle or viscose knits both to reveal the body and to give the illusion of transparency. And like Mr. Jacobs, though with more finesse and control, Mr. Simons feels a need at the moment to strip things down, to arrive at a clear shape with the absolute minimum of design."




The transparency look was really cool looking. It gave the feeling of liberty and freshness/pure. To me, fashion should not only be art, but at the same time should be usable. The majority of pieces from the Milan's Fashion Show are usable. Most could be RTW, with minimum alteration. In addition, I also think that fashion is also art, in every shape and size. The fabric itself has color, shape, size, and it sends a message of some sort to other people. I define art as anything that showcases a sense of feeling, curiosity, and imagination. Fashion in this sense is every way an art form. That is because clothes can have a deep impact on how one interpret others and it also says something about a person, thus invokes curiosity.


References:





Claire, Marie. Milan Fashion Week: Day 4. 26 October.http://www.marieclaire.co.uk/news/fashion/181634/milan-fashion-week-day-four.html.





Horyn, Cathy. Eroticism, Transparency and Overt Luxury in Milan. Fashion Review. 25 September 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/fashion/shows/26REVIEW-.html. 26 October 2008.


Obrien, Liam. London Fashion Week Critique. 28 February 2008.





Monday, October 6, 2008

Main Trends of the Paris Fashion Week


The middle dress is very interesting. It screams "parrots!!!"



I love these two dresses. The yellow one is more RTW. The white dress just looks cool.




I liked the Paris Fasion Week's show just as much as I liked the New York's show. I didn't really see anything that popped out so conspicuously, but there were few dresses that caught my attention.








I noticed that the Paris's fashion show displayed a little more tailored pieces as well as layers, mix and match, attitude, and less free-flowing fabrics. The designer's clothes had a more "stiff" feeling to me. For example, the white dress by Givenchy did not have much movement, but it had texture and layers. I think the designer might have gotten the inspiration by roses because to me it looks like white rose petals.

The one dress that stood out for me was the dress that looked like a parrot. The design was by Alexander McQueen. I think it is apparent where the inspiration came from because one look at it you can see an immediate resemblance to parrots. I didn't particularly like it but it's an eye-catcher. It worked for the show.

The yellow dress was by my favorite designer, Valentino. I love the color yellow, and I think the design fits appropriately with the way the dress is structured. It looks very elegant. As mentioned earlier, I think the design reminds viewers of flower petals. The majority of the dresses seemed to be resembling nature, which in this case are rose petals. The colors most used were reds, greys, white, black, pastels and nude.
My other favorite was a beautiful red dress by Rynshu for Masatomo. I just want to know how the dress holds up like that. It has a life of its own, and the design itself is really impressive. I hope to create something like that one day.

For the most part the collection projected a strong, clear, sexy attitude. That certainly suggests an attempt to answer the needs of the market.
References:
Cathy Horyn. Paris: Slaves to Romance. [Online] ( September 30th).
Fashion Week Daily. [Online] (October 6, 2008).

Liam OBrien. London Fashion Week Critique. [Onlinw] ( February 23rd, 2008).